1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide: Development, Properties, and Prospects

Historical Development

Chemists searching for new molecules to fuel advances in medicinal chemistry often find themselves looking at the long list of heterocyclic compounds developed over past decades. 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide entered the scene as part of a broader exploration of pyridine derivatives in the late 20th century. Scientists working with the pyrazolopyridine backbone observed its biological activity and chemical versatility, which fueled research into carboxamide substitutions for fine-tuning pharmacological profiles. While early explorations focused on central nervous system activity, more recent years have seen this scaffold featured in kinase inhibitor libraries and anti-inflammatory research, following the tendency of medicinal chemistry to revisit and repurpose known frameworks.

Product Overview

1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide stands as a specialty compound, synthesized for use in preclinical drug discovery and advanced organic synthesis. Its structure offers both the rigidity of fused aromatic rings and the modulation capabilities of a fluorobenzyl substituent. Research teams value such compounds for their ability to fill chemical space not well covered by simpler structures, making them especially attractive for building chemical libraries and screening for novel biological effects. My own work in a small research lab taught me that rare compounds like this don’t just stay on the shelf – they expand the number of hypotheses scientists can meaningfully test, pushing therapeutic innovation forward, even if the compound itself isn’t a final product.

Physical & Chemical Properties

1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide appears as a light solid, often white to slightly off-white, showing little odor or volatility. Its molecular weight hovers around the mid-200s, reflecting the added mass of a fluorine atom and the carboxamide moiety. Thanks to the fused rings and fluorinated benzyl, the molecule stays relatively rigid, which has implications for how it interacts with biological receptors and enzymes. Sparing use of water solubility, on the other hand, makes organic solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide and acetonitrile the solvents of choice for dissolving this compound in laboratory protocols. This matches my own experience handling pyridine derivatives – water is usually off the table.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Any legitimate supplier of 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide will affix technical and safety details to their product bottles. You will see a detailed chemical structure, batch-specific purity (commonly above 97% by HPLC), physical appearance, precise net weight, manufacturer contact, shelf life, and storage recommendations. In nearly every research setting I’ve visited, labeling clarity can mean the difference between reproducible science and wasted time. Regulatory adherence shows through with lot number traceability and documentation regarding hazardous materials handling, especially considering the possible unknown biological effects of newer research compounds.

Preparation Method

Production of this compound proceeds through multistep synthetic organic chemistry, beginning with assembly of the pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine core, followed by N-alkylation using the 2-fluorobenzyl substituent. Carboxamide introduction typically exploits an activated acid or acyl chloride, reacting it with an ammonia source under cooled, controlled conditions. This synthetic route shines a spotlight on challenges inherent in aromatic substitution, where controlling selectivity and yield makes the difference between a practical lab route and a theoretical curiosity. Practicing synthetic chemists often contend with sluggish amidation steps or the necessity for careful purification using flash chromatography, especially at scale.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

Chemists interested in altering the biological or physical profile of 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide can adjust substituents on the phenyl ring, exchange the fluorine position, or explore analogs where the carboxamide group swaps for other bioisosteres like sulfonamides or imidates. The core’s robustness against hydrolysis but susceptibility to strong nucleophiles or acids broadens the toolkit for chemical modification. In my experience, such frameworks open doors for click chemistry or palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions, allowing rapid library expansion. These structural changes guide future optimization both for biological target specificity and physicochemical compatibility.

Synonyms & Product Names

This compound gets referenced by various synonyms to ease international supply and keep up with company-specific inventories. Some literature and catalogs call it 2-Fluorobenzyl pyrazolopyridine carboxamide; suppliers sometimes opt for less systematic, but easier-to-remember trade names. This variation often reflects a supplier’s focus on either research or commercial clients. Regardless of naming, structure-based identifiers like InChI or SMILES codes guarantee global recognition among scientists.

Safety & Operational Standards

Uncharted toxicity profiles mean high standards in laboratory handling. Safety data sheets (SDS) put an emphasis on use of nitrile gloves, protective lab coats, and fume hoods. Accidental skin or eye exposure gets washed promptly – chemists learn quickly that, even when a compound’s risks aren’t fully charted, precaution always wins. Waste disposal follows guidelines for organic solvents and suspected hazardous compounds: it ends up in separate containers destined for specialized treatment. Workspaces dealing in these molecules train staff in emergency procedures, spill containment, and incident reporting protocols. Documentation isn’t window dressing; it provides a paper trail for audits, which is more than just a regulatory burden – it actually builds trust among research teams. In many research organizations I’ve visited, regular refresher courses on chemical handling form part of staff culture, not just a legal box to check.

Application Area

The reach of 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide can be traced across several research fields. Drug discovery groups appreciate this scaffold for its potential kinase inhibition properties, reflecting the molecule’s ability to fit into ATP-binding pockets in protein kinases. The shape and electronic profile lend themselves to protein-ligand docking studies and structure-activity relationship (SAR) projects, especially against inflammation and cancer targets. Outside pure pharmaceuticals, these compounds sometimes serve as building blocks for agrochemical R&D, probing ways to design more selective crop protectants or growth modulators. Each area grapples with distinct regulatory and safety demands, but the underlying need stays the same: new, unique molecules to probe complex biological pathways.

Research & Development

Academic and private labs see 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide as a start, not an end. Collaborative projects test this compound against panels of enzymes, signaling proteins, or cell lines. High-throughput screening environments plug it into vast libraries, seeking slivers of activity worth further investigation. In most real-world cases, positive hits kick off the lengthy process of analoging – systematic tweaking of the structure to boost potency, selectivity, physical properties, or safety. Tech transfer groups monitor market interest and patent filings. My own discussions with R&D chemists confirm that this kind of molecule rarely makes it intact into a final drug, but it often spurs ideas that redefine entire drug discovery campaigns.

Toxicity Research

The early-stage use of compounds like 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide means toxicity data can lag well behind synthesis. Most labs run basic cytotoxicity screens on human and animal cells, using standard readouts like MTT or resazurin assays. Researchers test for off-target effects using enzyme assays, ion channel panels, or even zebrafish embryos for developmental concerns. Until deeper animal studies arrive, data stays provisional, and this uncertainty gets reflected in cautious handling guidance. My colleagues always track new toxicity alerts; the networked nature of scientific collaboration helps quickly identify unanticipated dangers and turn informal findings into peer-reviewed publications.

Future Prospects

Looking ahead, the story of compounds like 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide intertwines with trends in data-driven discovery and personalized medicine. Scientists keep using advanced modeling platforms to forecast which molecules to make next, and new synthetic methods can make previously inaccessible derivatives more practical. As intellectual property landscapes shift and regulatory demands grow stricter, product traceability and detailed datasets become non-negotiable. Every step forward comes from both adopting what works in the lab and sharing those lessons on a global scale, letting newly-minted chemists build on a more robust foundation than existed just years earlier.



What are the main uses of 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide?

Medicinal Chemistry: Where Curiosity Meets Caution

This compound draws plenty of attention in the research world, especially among chemists exploring new drug candidates. Most talk about its role as a scaffold for experimental pharmaceuticals. Its pyrazolopyridine core, fused with a 2-fluorobenzyl group, presents a molecular shape that fits nicely into the active sites of certain enzymes or receptors in the body. That shape, plus the fluorine’s effect on metabolic stability, helps scientists tweak and test molecules fast, chasing better results with each attempt. There’s a lot of push to find better anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor compounds, and building blocks like this one show a promising fit.

Main Attraction in Kinase and Enzyme Inhibition Research

Cancer and autoimmune research keeps fueling demand for these specialized pyrazolopyridines. They look a lot like structures already proven to interact with kinases—those molecular switches controlling cell growth and immune responses. Adding a fluorine atom sometimes gives molecules more bite, letting them stick around longer in the bloodstream and resist quick breakdown by the liver. As a hands-on chemist, I’ve watched new molecules get run through computer models, tested in glassware, and screened for activity in cells, just hoping for a glimpse of strong inhibitory action. It all starts with a scaffold like 1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide.

From Lab Bench to Animal Trials

Once scientists identify a “hit” compound, things ramp up quickly. Researchers use analogs derived from this core to see how minor tweaks can push activity even higher or avoid trouble with side effects. There’s one repeating lesson: fluorine’s presence often leads to slower breakdown or greater selectivity, which might keep the active form “on target” a little longer. Graduate students and seasoned postdocs spend long hours building small libraries of these carboxamides, hoping that one demonstrates not just strong in vitro results, but real activity in animal models of cancer, inflammation, or even psychiatric disease.

Early Steps Toward Drug Discovery and More

This chemical falls in a gray area. It’s not a medicine you can pick up at the pharmacy. It hasn’t reached clinical approval. But it creates real forward motion in drug discovery, offering new shapes and properties when old options seem tapped out. Open databases show that related scaffolds fueled dozens of patents filed by big pharmaceutical companies over the last decade, each one representing a fresh attempt to tame diseases that keep causing pain and uncertainty.

Better Understanding and Responsible Science

Safety can't take a back seat here. Pyrazolopyridines—with or without fluorine tweaks—are treated as research chemicals. They don’t go near patients without heavy vetting and many stages of study. That doesn’t stop their influence. One day’s experiment contributes to the next, and with luck, a new approach to old medical problems comes into view. In my own lab work, no shortcut ever replaces real diligence and healthy skepticism.

Moving Toward Solutions

Progress relies on collaboration and shared data. Teams combine in-house screening, computational tools, and creative chemistry, looking for that standout molecule. Some advocate for bigger partnerships between university labs, hospital researchers, and pharmaceutical firms. Others call for deeper investment in basic research, so that the next generation of scientists knows how to use and improve molecules like this one. Staying honest about the possibilities—and the pitfalls—keeps hope grounded in reality.

What is the chemical purity and quality of this product?

Looking Beyond the Label

I’ve come across plenty of products that claim high chemical purity. At first glance, it sounds reassuring. But what does purity really mean for someone using this material in the lab or on the shop floor? Purity isn’t just a number printed on a datasheet. Behind that figure, there’s a world of controls, testing, and transparency. A label might read “99.9% pure,” but that last tenth of a percent can hold significant risk—tiny contaminants that creep in during manufacturing or storage might seriously change results or even safety.

Experience in the Lab: Why Trace Impurities Count

During my early days working with reagents, I underestimated the impact of minor contaminants. A batch of what was supposed to be sodium chloride led to cloudy reactions. Later analysis showed traces of magnesium—not enough to flag on a standard inspection, but enough to spoil a critical experiment. This kind of thing happens everywhere from environmental science to electronics. Industries like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors demand raw materials with near-absolute purity, because even invisible impurities can crash quality or introduce harmful by-products.

Quality Assurance Starts at the Source

Quality isn’t produced just in the last stage of a process. It starts much earlier, at the source of raw materials. I’ve visited facilities where the sourcing of feedstock makes or breaks purity. If your supplier isn’t tracking where chemicals come from, or if they cut corners on processing equipment, purity drops even before the product hits the warehouse. Trusted manufacturers go beyond basic checks, running a battery of tests at every stage. They reveal not only the main ingredient’s concentration, but also fingerprint “off-spec” compounds that might sneak in from containers, air, or even the water used in rinsing lines.

Transparency and Documentation

Documentation tells the real story. A reputable supplier doesn’t just hand over a product; they provide analysis reports that show exactly what’s inside each batch. I’ve learned to look for certificates of analysis (COAs) with details specific to the lot I receive, not just recycled templates. Checking for third-party testing or accreditation—like ISO certification—offers more peace of mind. Instead of guessing based on marketing claims, rely on documented evidence to confirm what you’re handling.

Risks of Playing Fast and Loose

Cutting costs by ignoring purity checks may save a few dollars, but the fallout can run much higher. In tech, purity slips can ruin dozens of wafers in a single run. For pharmaceuticals, undetected contaminants find their way into medicine. In agriculture, small doses of a contaminant could damage crops or impact food safety years down the road. Fires, explosions, or health hazards result from misjudged chemical grades. I’ve seen labs forced to start over or face costly recalls, all traceable to poor quality assurance.

Building Better Habits

Companies and individuals should keep a curious mindset. Don’t take claims at face value: ask for current data, push for transparency, and understand where each ingredient comes from. Build supplier relationships based on trust and verified evidence, not price alone. For customers, learning to read and understand quality reports pays off. Taking shortcuts on purity rarely works out in the long run—small checks now prevent expensive failures later. It’s a habit that sticks with you in any chemistry-driven field.

What are the recommended storage conditions for this compound?

Looking Beyond the Label

A bottle of chemicals carries more meaning than a simple hazard sign or expiration date. For anyone familiar with a laboratory or stockroom, it’s clear that the way you store a compound shapes everything from its shelf life to its safety profile. I remember how a careless decision with an organic peroxide cost the lab an entire month of headaches. The compound degraded, releasing gases and making inventory unusable. It’s easy to forget that storage advice isn’t just bureaucracy—chemistry and risk depend on it.

Cool, Dry, and Dark: Not Just a Cliché

Advice to keep a chemical “cool, dry, and dark” pops up everywhere. That isn’t just an old saying; it has roots in real science. Temperatures above room temperature speed up reactions, sometimes spoiling stability or causing decomposition. Humidity invites water into the mix, sparking unwanted hydrolysis in powders and liquids. Light, especially ultraviolet, nudges certain compounds toward breakdown or even new reactions, especially in sensitive APIs or organics.

Think of nitrate salts or sodium azide. Exposure to moisture can turn an innocent bottle into a disaster waiting to happen. I once opened a reagent cabinet to find a supposedly white compound pink and clumpy. Sunlight found its way through a crack in the blinds—photosensitive compounds like silver salts turned unstable. Incidents like these drive home that sunlight and heat aren’t minor threats.

Original Containers and Practical Precautions

Factories put chemicals in certain bottles for good reason. Manufacturers use glass or special plastics because they resist interactions—acids can punch holes through the wrong cap, and solvents dissolve the wrong label. Leaky bottles mean lost money, lost time, and sometimes lost safety. In my own lab work, I learned that old habits like pouring leftovers into unlabeled jars don’t suit modern science or safety expectations. Regulators, peers, and insurance policies all expect better.

I rarely trust makeshift storage. Original packaging lists batch numbers, hazards, and storage advice. Tampering with that routine opens the door to confusion, double dosing, or unwanted chemical reactions. I saw a colleague scramble to dispose of a chemical after learning the plastic bottle he’d used six months earlier now looked cracked and misshapen.

Ventilation, Segregation, and Respecting Incompatibilities

Some chemicals play well with others, and some need segregation. Strong oxidizers next to organics can lead to incident reports nobody wants to file. A proper storage plan counts on physical barriers and distance, not luck. Flammable liquids belong in self-closing safety cabinets. Acids and bases like their own shelves. Storing these together causes messy spills and, in worst case scenarios, dangerous releases.

Dry rooms with steady ventilation reduce buildup of hazardous vapors, especially around volatile organics or reactive solids. Even routine compounds sometimes release gases, and that risk multiplies in closed spaces. Proper labeling, segregated cabinets, and plenty of air flow go a long way toward dodging accidents.

Fine-Tuning With Specifics from the Datasheet

Every chemical deserves a quick check against its data sheet, not just a guess based on similar-sounding names. The document usually spells out exact temperature ranges, whether refrigeration is needed, and other quirks—whether a compound off-gasses, freezes, or polymerizes under storage. For example, peroxides need checking for crystal buildup, while certain pharmaceuticals come with strict limitations on heat and humidity.

Storage decisions deserve this level of detail. It’s a puzzle where the reward is safety, reliability, and full scientific value. Skipping steps doesn’t just put equipment at risk; it compromises everyone’s well-being.

Is there any safety or handling information for this product?

Paying Attention to What’s in the Box

Most folks reach for a new product, rip open the packaging, and dive right in. Maybe they toss the leaflet aside or skim for the instructions. That’s a natural move, but rushing can lead to trouble. Chemical cleaners, small appliances, even fancy packaging can trip up the unwary. Burns, skin irritation, electrical accidents, or even something as unassuming as a splash from a leaky bottle can ruin your day. I learned the hard way once with a bottle of grout cleaner—no gloves, no open window. Lesson burned into my skin and lungs. So yes, product safety isn’t just fine print; it’s real life.

Safety Isn’t Just Fine Print

Companies try to give safety information up front. They place icons, bold headings, even little cartoon warnings on packaging. Some do it better than others. The best warnings use plain language—no jargon, no hidden meanings. For example: “Wear gloves. Avoid eyes. Ventilate room.” These simple cues make all the difference, especially when you’re in a hurry or feeling tired. I always think back to the day a neighbor ignored a “ventilate” warning and landed in the ER. The product seemed harmless, but fumes built up fast.

Reading the Material Safety Data Sheets

Not every product comes with obvious hazards, but chemicals and hardware often have a more in-depth safety data sheet. These documents tell you exactly what you’re working with—dangerous ingredients, how to treat exposure, what to do in an emergency. OSHA in the United States requires this material for certain products, and reputable companies make sure it’s easy to find. Whether you’re running a small shop or just tackling chores around the house, it pays to check online for these data sheets. More than once, I found important steps for disposal and storage only buried in these sheets—not on the front label.

Why You Should Care

Every season brings news about recalls and accidents. Kids ingesting laundry pods, household explosions from mixing cleaners, skin reactions from new cosmetics. Over a million poisoning cases hit American emergency rooms each year—often due to mistakes that clear safety guidance can prevent. Taking two minutes to check handling tips can save a trip to the hospital. Proper storage matters too; putting cleaners on a high shelf or locking up pesticides means fewer worries later, especially if children or pets live at home.

Spreading Good Habits

Handing down good safety habits makes a real difference. My own home sits stocked with old peanut butter jars—filled with screws, not caustic chemicals. I always label the jars and store anything hazardous high and out of reach. Around the community, sharing what you know helps, too. Pointing a friend to a warning label or lending them a pair of gloves can keep small problems from turning big.

What Solutions Can Look Like

Manufacturers should keep safety information clear on all products—big bold icons, simple directions, and easy access to safety data sheets. Retailers can post QR codes linking direct to handling instructions right where shoppers pick up goods. We all benefit if safety isn’t hidden, but instead spelled out on every package. Small steps—like wearing gloves, using fans, and reading labels—underpin a safe home. It’s about building habits, not waiting for regret.

What is the molecular weight and chemical formula of this compound?

Digging Into What Makes Up a Compound

Folks often ask about the molecular weight and chemical formula of a compound as if they’re locked behind some secret code. If you’ve spent time in a chemistry class, you know these two facts tell us almost everything vital about a substance. The chemical formula acts like a map. It lists each kind of atom packed inside those molecules. Spotting H2O lets you know it’s water; each part points to something familiar. Getting the correct formula isn’t only about satisfying curiosity. It makes a real difference, especially for people working in medicine, food safety, or environmental testing. If the formula’s off—if you’ve got CO instead of CO2—the hazards change in an instant.

Molecular Weight Is Not Just a Label

As someone who’s mixed solutions for lab projects and double-checked molecular weights before making up a buffer, I’ve seen mistakes turn simple tasks into headaches. The molecular weight tells you how heavy a molecule is. Chemists weigh powders and measure liquids based on these numbers. For pharmacists, the difference between getting a dose right and getting it dangerously wrong can come down to this figure.

A compound’s formula and its weight help factories meet strict product requirements. In the food world, even a small miscalculation can risk consumer health. I once spoke to a colleague in industrial baking who shared how a supply chain error swapped sodium bicarbonate with sodium carbonate in bulk shipments. Both powders look similar, but their formulas and molecular weights differ. The mix ruined a day's worth of baked goods and cost far more in clean-up and damage control.

The Science Behind Accuracy

Let’s take a closer look at what goes into figuring out these details. The chemical formula shows every type of atom—hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, and others—plus how many of each. Formulas don’t just help chemists. They help firefighters recognize risks in a spill or doctors understand toxic exposures.

Combining atomic masses for each atom in the formula gets the total molecular weight. Pharmacies rely on this calculation every day, measuring compounds for precise doses or compounding custom medicines. Industry quality control teams do it too, using it to match materials with their specifications. Getting any number wrong isn’t just a typo—it could spell trouble for anyone relying on that batch.

Real-World Solutions for Staying Sharp

Mistakes happen even with smart people at the helm. Automated systems, advanced molecular databases, and handheld devices can speed up checks. Training and ongoing education for everyone handling chemicals keep the risk of error lower. Creating clear labels and digital logs can end tough guesswork later down the line.

I remember reading about health labs where outdated information led to misidentification on a chemical’s label. Later, those labs updated catalog systems to flag similar-sounding compounds by formula and weight. That move cut their error rates by half.

The careful steps taken in calculating and double-checking chemical formulas and weights ripple out far beyond any lab or classroom. They mean safer workplaces, better medicine, and steadier trust in the products we bring into our homes.

1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide
1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide
1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-3-carboxamide